DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON
SECTION: WACO INVESTIGATION ON FREE REPUBLIC
SUBSECTION: CARLOS GHIGLIOTTI
Revised 9/17/00
Dallas Morning News 10/7/99 Lee Hancock " .High-quality copies of FBI infrared tapes released this week to Branch Davidian lawyers include repeated bursts of rhythmic flashes from both government positions and the sect's compound, and two experts hired by the sect's lawyer say the flashes must be gunfire. A third expert, retained by the House Government Reform committee, analyzed a lower-quality copy of the infrared tape, which was shot on the last day of a 1993 standoff with the sect near Waco. He also concluded that flashes visible on the tape had to be gunfire, a committee staffer confirmed Wednesday ."
Dallas Morning News 10/7/99 Lee Hancock " .Information that the Houston lawyers presented to Mr. Danforth's team included an expert's analysis that the FBI's infrared videotapes released to the public, Congress and the courts appear to have been altered, Mr. Caddell said. If the same gaps and electronic anomalies appear in original tapes still in Justice Department custody, Mr. Caddell said, he will use that to challenge the government's fire investigation as fatally flawed A former government recording expert hired by the Houston lawyer said he found repeated anomalies. "There's so much editing on this tape, it's ridiculous," said Steve Cain, who spent more than 20 years as an audio and video expert with the U.S. Secret Service and the Internal Revenue Service's national crime lab in Chicago. Mr. Cain said his analysis is preliminary because he has not been granted access to the original tapes. But he said his work has turned up evidence of erasures of audio, including the one-hour, 20-minute period before the compound fire "
Dallas Morning News 10/7/99 Lee Hancock " .Carlos Ghigliotti, an expert retained by the House panel investigating the Waco matter, was quoted by the Washington Post Wednesday that his analysis of the tapes convinced him that FBI agents shot in the direction of the Davidian compound on April 19. .."
Dallas Morning News 10/7/99 Lee Hancock " .The infrared tapes sent Monday to Mr. Caddell were described by Justice Department lawyers as "first-generation" copies of the original tapes shot at Waco on April 19, he said. . Inexplicably included in the opening minutes of that tape is an eight-minute portion date-stamped April 16. That footage appears to be a frozen infrared shot of an empty field with no images of the compound. Mr. Cain said that was one of the most egregious of what he described as dozens of unexplained anomalies. "And it appears that either insert edits or other types of over recordings were made by the same or different video camera sources," said his Sept. 30 preliminary report to Mr. Caddell. . Maurice Cox, a retired satellite imagery analyst and mathematician who worked for 33 years on secret government photo-reconnaissance projects said Wednesday that he shares many of Mr. Cain's concerns. He recently examined copies of the FBI infrared tapes released last month. "There are things that I don't understand. I don't know what they mean, but I know that you need to go to the master tapes and find out what in the hell is going on," said Mr. Cox, who lives in California. "
Dallas Morning News 10/7/99 Lee Hancock " .Mr. Ghigliotti could not be reached Wednesday. In a statement released by the House Government Reform Committee, Chairman Dan Burton, R-Ind., said he had been briefed on his findings and found them "troubling." But he said that it was premature to draw conclusions. ......"
New York Post 1999? Brian Blomquist " ..An expert in thermal imaging has concluded that the FBI fired shots during the 1993 Waco siege, contrary to the government's claim that no shots were fired. "I conclude that the FBI fired shots that day," Carlos Ghigliotti, whose expertise has been sought by the House Government Reform Committee, told The Washington Post. "I conclude this based on the ground-view videotapes taken from several different angles simultaneously and based on the overhead thermal tape. The gunfire from the ground is there, without a doubt," he added. Ghigliotti, an expert in thermal imaging and videotape analysis who has done past work for the FBI, analyzed videotapes of the government siege on the Branch Davidian compound, which killed about 80 people near Waco, Texas. He said the tapes also show that the Branch Davidians were firing on the FBI agents during the siege, meaning the FBI could have returned fire based on the rules of engagement ."
New York Post 1999? Brian Blomquist " ..From 1991 to 1995, Ghigliotti, 42, was paid by the FBI as a thermal-imaging expert in an array of environmental-dumping cases, according to an FBI document. Ghigliotti "performed reliable work for the FBI," the 1995 document states. In 1993, Ghigliotti was sentenced to 18 months of unsupervised probation and fined $250 for assaulting the owner of a dump site. Ghigliotti, who had prepared documents for a Maryland environmental agency, alleged that the dump-site owner duped him by posing as a county watchman to improperly gain access to the documents . The Government Reform Committee also is re-investigating Waco - and is going to ask other video/thermal experts, besides Ghigliotti, to analyze the tapes. .."
DRUDGE 4/29/00 " ..Police said Saturday they are investigating the death of an expert hired by a congressional committee who alleged last October that shots were fired in the Waco siege. There was no sign of a break-in or struggle at the firm of Infrared Technology outside Washington where the badly decomposed body of Carlos Ghigliotti, 42, was found Friday afternoon, Laurel police said in a news release. Ghigliotti had not been seen for several weeks. The office of the chief medical examiner for the state of Maryland was performing an autopsy in Baltimore. The autopsy wasn't expected to be completed until Monday. ."
Washington Post 4/29/00 Cindy Loose " .Carlos Ghigliotti, who had been retained by a U.S. House committee to help investigate the 1993 siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Tex., was found dead in Laurel under unexplained circumstances yesterday. "We're investigating it as a homicide," said Laurel police spokesman Jim Collins. Ghigliotti, 42, was found about 1:30 p.m. in the 600 block of Washington Boulevard. His body was badly decomposed, said police. There were no signs of a break-in or a struggle at the home, where Ghigliotti ran his business, Infrared Technologies Corp., police said "
Washington Post 4/29/00 " .A building manager, concerned that no one had seen Ghigliotti for some weeks, contacted police, who found the body .Ghigliotti's body was transported to the chief medical examiner's office in Baltimore for an autopsy ."
Washington Post 4/29/00 " .Michael Caddell, lead lawyer in a $100 million wrongful death lawsuit stemming from the Waco siege, said last night that he recently had discussed the findings with Ghigliotti and intended to retain him--not only because his work was impressive but also because Caddell's first expert had suffered a stoke recently ."
Washington Post 4/29/00 " . Caddell said that two weeks ago he wrote to Waco Special Counsel John C. Danforth, urging that he interview Ghigliotti immediately. Caddell said he'd heard of Ghigliotti's death yesterday from Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.), chair of the committee that retained Ghigliotti. Police called Burton, Caddell said, because his business card was found in Ghigliotti's pocket ."
Freeper Ian Goddard 4/29/00 " I'd previously spoken to Dr Edward Allard, who almost died of a heart attack the week before the FLIR test, the same week that another witness for the plaintiffs suddenly died of a heart attack. When I called Allard yesterday, I was told that he can no longer talk about Waco. Since Allard's disabling stroke, the attorney's for the plaintiffs have been looking for another FLIR expert and were going to sign on Carlos Ghigliotti, but unfortunately he was just found dead yesterday. Are they knocking them off one by one, or what? . "
Freeper Map Kernow 4/29/00 " "He also told me that that the House Gov't Reform Committee had even more data than he did, that he knew only part of it and couldn't talk about it, but that it was really shocking." ..Thank you for all we're likely to know about the untimely end of Carlos Ghigliotti. Let me add to the above datum that it is also likely that people in the Cox Commission have information on the extent of Chinese espionage and cooperation by the Clinton Administration, that ranges far beyond what they considered fit to release. I've been told that it's 100x anyone's worst imaginings. But apparently none of us are going to know until after Clinton leaves power, if that ever happens. .."
Freeper Map Kernow 4/29/00 " My source is a fellow FReeper who lives in Newport Beach in Cox's District, who went to "Town Hall" meetings featuring Cong. Cox (who really is a decent guy) and got this kind of feedback. My constituent buddy figures that the *ahem!* "bipartisan" character of the Cox Report prevented the worst details from getting into the report, in order to get acquiescence in the final report from the Democrats on the committee rather than the usual partisan sniping. Maybe Cox didn't figure on all the partisan sniping once the report was released from those Democrats who weren't on the committee! .."
Freeper robnoel 4/29/00 " .I have had McNaulty on my show many times I will have him on again Monday sorry I can't say what hour...however Thursday last week in Ft.Collins he showed for the first time the slides (FLIR) in question....there is no question about what it shows....unlike watching "WACO "THE NEW REVALATION" on video this was shown in a movie theater.....he proved that the FBI had doctored a frame of video....this was a scene where the first shots were fired from the FBI chopper....on the FBI video no one is seen in the court yard however in the tape McNaulty has you can clearly see someone.....and the agents laying fire into the building from behind the tank......amazing! .."
Freeper Ada Coddington 4/29/00 David Hardy
http://www.wizardsofaz.com/waco/carlos.html " What follows is something I have not been able to reveal prior to this point. As I mention at the end, I am now released from my promise of secrecy. Please forgive the length--I think you'll find it worthwhile. This covers many months of evidence and conversations, which I've had to keep quiet.The House Gov't Reform Committee had retained an infrared expert named Carlos Ghigliotti, of Laurel, Md. Carlos had been working on the FLIR for months, and shared a lot of his results with me. I'd pass him data when he needed it, and he knew he could count on me to keep my mouth shut. Carlos had done a lot of IR work -- including using it to spot polluters contaminating Chesapeake Bay, and diagnosing electronic errors (a bad connection or phase mismatch heats up). He loved his work, and was proud of some electronic inventions which enabled him to link together visual and IR imaging into a single image. He got into some courtroom work--chiefly determining if FLIR used to justify a drug search warrant was properly used or not. He had two principles: (1) if retained, he would tell the absolute truth as to everything and (2) he would never accept a second retainer from a drug suspect. No matter how egregious the misuse a second time around, he wasn't interested in being of assistance to a man who violated the law a second time.
He'd just had a case where an attorney tried to grill him... but the more questions the guy asked, the deeper he got into the hole, until the courtroom security guards were all wandering in and sitting in the back, amusing themselves at the attorney's expense. Carlos knew his stuff, and he laid it right on the line.
I talked with Carlos over the phone a lot, and visited him in his lab a couple of times. I now forget the first one, but the second visit was the day Mike McNulty previewed his latest film in DC.
Thru the committee, Carlos was able to obtain a much better quality tape than any anyone else had. He discovered that, when FBI gave out "first generation copies," it was in fact giving out copies of a digitized "master," not of the original analog tape. Digitization compresses the image, and loses some of its quality. He demanded and got, thru the Committee, a copy of the original tape, on Super VHS, with some other tweakings to make it the most perfect copy possible. He said they brought out the envelope with the original--it had about twenty chain-of-custody signatures on it. He figured that his copy was as close to identical to the original tape as it was possible to have--whereas the ones everyone else has been using are a few generations down.
Then he imported the video into his lab equipment (which I've seen--VERY impressive--four big monitors, Super VHS decks, two computers with more speed, RAM, and hard drive than I ever thought possible.). He was thorough, refusing to make a finding until he had it pinned down from every angle. In one case, he told me last month, he'd finally managed to link by time and location an image of a person shouldering a weapon, shown on the regular media videotapes made from the media locations, with a flash on the FLIR.
He found nearly 200 suspected gunshots, and had done the work necessary to verify that many of these were genuine. Understand that his idea of "verify" wasn't just to see the image. He wanted to find the shooters, as well, and to plot their movement from one flash location to another. And he wanted to correlate the FLIR images to every possible ordinary video image, to see if he could link up what the media filmed from the side with what the FLIR registered from overhead. He was really hot on getting some footage shot by DPS from a site behind the building, so that he could tie that in as well. This man was thorough--no rushing to judgment on anything. His normal standard was to study everything from every possible angle or potential critique, until he could lay all the cards on the table, be absolutely clear, and defend his conclusions against any criticism. And he knew this was no normal case... as he once said, the Waco FLIR was probably going to be the next Zapuder film, and he wasn't going to say something that he couldn't prove against any criticism.
On the side (and I have no idea why he was analyzing this) he said it had been determined that almost the entire Waco operation, not only 2/28 but the siege, had been improperly financed from money that law enforcement was supposed to use only in the war on drugs. He said there was plenty of documentation here, showing flow of money. In the 2/28 videotape, the ATF agents are all trying on new uniforms, new equipment -- everything down to the computers in the media area of the raid HQ were bought out of money supposed to be used only in drug enforcement. He said that much or all of the siege had been financed the same way. There were written standards in the gov't for when the drug enforcement money could be used, and these could be shown to have been violated in black and white terms. A considerable amount of money had been, well, embezzled, to support the effort.
Carlos also told me, last month, that he'd seen FLIRs from nights before 4/19, and that it was apparent that the FLIR aircraft was being used to monitor the Davidians' water supply. The water was stored in those big plastic tanks at the rear of the building, and the coolness of the water inside showed up as a darker area. It was apparent that the water supply was shrinking, and by 4/19 was almost gone. He had heard the aircraft crew talking about it, and noting that the level was going down. So, essentially, they knew that thirst would force an end to the siege within a few days of 4/19.
While I was in his lab, he showed me some footage where it was clear, beyond any doubt, that a man was moving in the wreckage of the gym. The guy gets up from behind one pile of cover and races to another. In between, you see a very long flash that exists only for an instant -- much longer in terms of physical length than could be attributed to a gunshot. He said that was a bullet imaged in flight--he'd imaged them before, while flying past shooting ranges. (Shooters know that a bullet after firing is too hot to pick up in the hand, a product of being rammed down a barrel ahead of burning powder, and then of air resistance as it travels at Mach 2-3 thru the air. I'd never suspected that one would show up on IR.). These scenes I saw with my own eyes, on his equipment--it was clear there was a person there.
He'd done a preliminary report for the House committee before they had a falling out--he wanted to do a really throrough job, which he said would take months, and they wanted him to do a final report quickly. (He also mentioned that they'd been slow in payment, and he'd needed their check to buy some more equipment that he wanted to devote to the final analysis.). He said that someone (I think he said Rep. Burton himself) had called and threatened that they'd sue him for what he'd already been paid, and he decided he wouldn't take that guff from anyone. He would finalize his report, brief everyone, and that would be it.
The prelim report I have here (he wanted to keep it secret for the time being, and faxed me a copy with instructions to keep my mouth shut. As will be set out below, I think I have been released from that promise.). To summarize:
11:24:16 to 36: shots from two locations into hole made by CEV in gym.
11:24:50 to 11:25:04 apparent return fire from inside of gym.
11:26:13 to 11:26:27 additional return fire. If the dark objects behind the tank are indeed shooters, this may have pinned them down. Following this, the tank backs over the dark spots.
11:26:39 "One of the two unknown subjects is clearly visible exiting out of the hole in the front wall of the gym which the tank previously made. The unknown subject turns to the right into the courtyard."
11:28:04 to 11:28:14: gunfire from this person's approximate position, directed toward building.
11:28:18 to 11:28:22: return fire from structure.
11:30:09 to 11:30:15: gunfire from shooter in courtyard, toward building.
11:33:51: gunfire between gym wall and swimming pool, into the structure. The infrared signature of these shots differs from those seen earlier in courtyard area.
11:34:32: one shot at unknown subject that is running and hiding between gym and swimming pool. [This may be the one he showed me]
11:38:34: unknown subject is seen hiding in front of tank.
11:43:36 to 11:59:03: gunshots from 2d story of building directed at tank (I believe he is here referring to the tank penetrating the front).
12:03:59: An unknown subject appears next to the tank in rear of structure.
12:07:42: fire is visible in 2nd story tower.
12:08:12: Unknown subject comes out of tank and shows up at 12:08:51 shooting at another unknown subject that appears at 12:08:34.
12:08:31 to 12:08:32: "A cluster of thermal anomalies appears at the corner of the gym."
12:08:34 and 12:08:44: unknown subject runs from the area where the thermal anomalies were seen, hops over rubble, and hides in gym.
12:08:51: automatic gunfire into area where previous subject hides.
12:10:41 to 12:11:15 numerous rounds shot from center of courtyard, directed at structure.
Past this point, nothing of importance since fire overloads FLIR, but visible media and the soundtrack of FLIR indicates that gunfire did continue.
He notes that events at 11:24:31, 11:24:35 and 11:28:14 may have involved more than one shot.
He notes that a pattern was apparent: Davidian return fire only occurred following penetration of the building by an armored vehicle. "Total number of events that occurred between 10:41:57 and 12:16:13: 198."
He told me, in late March, that he'd met with both the majority and the minority of the committee (after they sorta broke off relations) and shown them his results. Each briefing was in detail and consumed several hours. I forget the exact numbers, but somewhere around 3-8 people, mostly attorneys for the committee, were present at each briefing. He was still working on a final report when last I spoke with him. He was rather miffed that they had not given him time to analyze everything, and said he intended to insert a final section outlining all the things he had wanted to analyze when relations were broken off. He added that the minority staff had been rather surprised to see the data, since apparently the majority had been informing them only of a minimal amount of his results. Some of them suggested that maybe both the Demos and Republicans could hire him on jointly, to do a really thorough piece of work. He was rather flattered at the idea (if Carlos had any politics, I never heard of it) altho he said he was suffering from "Waco fatigue" and wanted to get back to his regular work, or even a long overdue vacation.
My memory may be imperfect here, but as I recall he talked about the scene at the rear, where there is that big flash near the "dog house." His interpretation: The flash appeared to be multiple flash-bangs. It was possible they were actually thrown by a Davidian, altho not certain. But right after it, a person can be see running back into the building. A hatch opens on the CEV. When it opens, the cooler, darker interior of the vehicle is visible. A person exits the hatch. This is not totally clear, and some people agreed with his interpretation and others did not. But the person who dismounts then fires, the shots going toward the last location where the suspected Davidian is seen. He added that the Committee knew exactly who was under that hatch, so they could actually name the guy who did it. He could afterward track at least two suspected FBI shooters. He could spot their location--one stayed in the gym wreckage, and the other moved out into the courtyard, where he shoots. Ian Goddard had spotted what he thought was a structure, alongside the gym, and from which some shots come. I checked a color photo, and the structure is actually a big chunk of gym wall that the tank has knocked over and falls outward into the courtyard. I mentioned that to Carlos, and Carlos said it was more complex than that. The shooter had been in the courtyard to begin with, and the tank knocked the wall segment atop him. If there hadn't been other wreckage to catch it and hold it up a bit, he would have been squashed. I believe Carlos said that the gunshot images from that location were a little distorted, probably because the wall segment was cutting off part of the image at times.
Carlos also found indications that shots were being fired into the underground storm shelter after the fire began. On one of the regular media videotapes, you could see a long, bright flash going down into the pit, from in front of one of the armored vehicles. He said it was no sunlight flash, he'd imaged it on three different media tapes from slightly different angles. His best assessment was that it was the fuse on a pyrotechnic round. I saw this tape, also, with my own eyes. His view was that they were gassing the underground vault to pin Davidians in place during the fire.
Carlos was about as credible as they come. He'd done work for the FBI in the past, in fact, and often worked with gov't agencies. He had no particular ax to grind with regard to Waco: he once told me "the only thing that makes me mad about this is when I can see government officials making statements, and know for an absolute fact that they are lying." He also told me that that the House Gov't Reform Committee had even more data than he did, that he knew only part of it and couldn't talk about it, but that it was really shocking. He said that the big problem the Committee seemed to see was the question of how they could get the information out, while at the same time preventing another Oklahoma City type reprisal--it was that shocking. This conversation came shortly after Carlos' name had first been mentioned in the press, and the Committee rather played down his statements, saying they were based on visual video rather than FLIR (which was true only in small part). I asked about that--was the Committee getting cold feet over his evidence, or just playing their cards close to the chest. He said it was the latter -- they just hadn't figured out how to let the info out yet. (He was then meeting with the majority on a weekly basis, to brief them on his latest results.).
I talked to him after the recreation, and his assessment was that it was pure junk -- the aircraft wasn't even at the right altitude, they didn't have the right procedures to verify that the sensor was functioning comparable to the one of 4/19, etc. The best thing that could be done with any resulting tape (and this is BEFORE the results were known) was to drop it in the wastecan. Whether it showed gunshots or did not, it'd be useless for proving anything, whether for the Davidians or the FBI.
I remember talking to him outside his office, after the first visit, standing there in the parking lot after dark. He'd mentioned that the guy with Infraspection Institute, who had analyzed the FLIR for 60 Minutes back in '95 or '96, and found FBI gunshots and shooters on it, had been terrified. In fact, he'd sent copies of the tape to Carlos and to several others in the IR field, with notes saying "If anything happens to me, you'll know why." (The same guy later called me, said he didn't want his name used, that "there are too many people already in their graves over this." I wrote him off as him being rather nervous.).
I asked Carlos, there in the parking lot, if he'd ever been fearful. He said only for a while, between the time he made his findings and the time he reported them to the Committee. Then he had been worried, because he was looking at clear evidence that would nail a LOT of FBI agents on perjury, and perhaps much worse. But once he told others of his results, he figured the cat was out of the bag.
This is a rather long post, but there is a reason. It's in part a memorial for a feisty and totally honest guy I came to like a good deal.
On April 19 of this year, from the hotel room in Waco, I called Carlos to report a minor discovery (the roof of the storm shelter, which glows bright white on the FLIR, wasn't just plywood--it was covered in black asphalt, which explained why it got so hot in the sun.). I got his answering machine, but when it came time to leave a message, the tape just said "tape finished. Thank you for calling." I thought he'd run out of tape--never happened before, but who knows? I tried again from time to time -- same result. I sent email asking him to call. Well, maybe he was out of town. Early today I tried again, and this time nothing picked up, the phone just rang off the hook.
Then this afternoon I received a call. Carlos was found dead in his apartment. Perhaps the guy with Infraspection was right. I've got a call in to Laurel PD to tell them what little I know.... my phone records show calls to him up thru 3/30, after that he must have called me but there's no record, and I was unable to reach him on 4/19 and thereafter.
Too damn bad. He was a good man, and I'd come rather to like him. He was rigorously honest -- his own man, and no one elses'. Since the Committee has his results (and has had information on it for months now), I guess we'll soon know how serious they are about investigating Waco.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Carlos Ghigliotti was the owner of Infrared Technologies Corp. in Laurel, Maryland. Washington Post reports that from 1991 to 1995, Ghigliotti, 42, was paid by the FBI as a thermal imaging expert on an array of environmental dumping cases, according to an FBI document. Ghigliotti "performed reliable work for the FBI," the 1995 document states. http://www.waco93.com/washingtonpost10_6_99.htm .."
Freeper Lex 4/29/00 " ..April 29, 2000 4:20 am Arizona Time I just called the Laurel Police Department and got this statement:
"At 1:27 PM officers were called to 608 Washington Blvd., Laurel, Maryland, in response to a phone call about a man who had been missing for several weeks.
When officers arrived they found no signs of forced entry. Inside the apartment they found a badly decomposed body of a male, appearing to be in his 40's. No sign of a struggle was observed at that time. The body was processed and sent to the chief medical examiner in Baltimore. The body was of Carlos Ghigliotti, 42 yrs. of age, who resided at the same address where he was found."
Public Relations Officer Jim Collins 350 Municipal Square Laurel, MD 20707 Phone: 301-498-0092
This is all I have for now... there should be a full story from Dallas Morning News and The Washington Post in a few hours.
Freeper Demidog 4/29/00 " . I've corresponded on and off with David T. Hardy for about 7 years. I've known him to be fair and truthfull to a fault. "
Freeper Republic 4/29/00 " .My guess-he was trying to contact DAN BURTON the day he was killed-or while he was dying. He found something out...something that would rock the WACO boat and expose the putrid underbelly of that creepy tortuous massacre .."
Freeper Covenantor 4/29/00 " Several weeks and no one complained about the smell of the 'badly decomposed body'? No mention of of ransacking his studio area (he ran the business from home). No colleagues or friends tried to reach him in that period? Who now has control of the office/residence? The business card found sounds like a warning. .Wonder why Danforth hasn't taken control of the office/residence? .."
Freeper roughrider 4/29/00 " I guess those women who run the firm Infraspection in California were right to withdraw their participation in the "60 Minutes" piece about Waco that was referred to in WACO: THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT. As soon as they saw that gunfire was directed into the building, and pyrotechnic explosions were visible on the FLIR, Infraspection told "60 Minutes" in a letter that they wanted out of the story. There will be only one story told, and that is the Davidians got what they had coming to them. Since the vast majority of Americans did not lose any family members in the assault, they do not care, and look with suspicion and even alarm at those of us who do "
Freeper wooly_mammoth 4/29/00 " .."The business card found sounds like a warning." Yup, it sure does .."
Reply from Dave Hardy 5/3/00 " ..
Freeper Covenantor 4/29/00 " Several weeks and no one complained about the smell of the 'badly decomposed body'?
I've wondered about that one, too. no idea. It was in an office building, and corpses, well, do get awful rank after a while. I know I tried to contact him with no success on 4/19, ten days before he was found, so it'd be at least ten days and maybe more.
No mention of of ransacking his studio area (he ran the business from home).
Press reports are wrong, here. The address where he was found, 608 Washington Blvd in Laurel, was his office, not his home. It's on the third floor of an office building. I've been there... no living quarters at all. A two-room office, one room for desks, one for his electronics lab.
No colleagues or friends tried to reach him in that period?
Again, I dunno. Some may have tried, as I did, and assumed he was out of town. I tried on 4/19, several times later, until 4/29 right around when he was found. Never occured to me that something was really wrong. I go out of town from time to time, and my voicemail computer sometimes crashes or I am sloppy about returning calls. I knew he'd had an out of state court case, and had been talking about finally taking a vacation, so I figured it was one of those.
Who now has control of the office/residence? The business card found sounds like a warning.
I suspect he was just carrying it around, in case he wanted to have the number at home or at the office. I'm told it was found in his wallet.
Wonder why Danforth hasn't taken control of the office/residence? .." Freeper roughrider 4/29/00 " I guess those women who run the firm Infraspection in California were right to withdraw their participation in the "60 Minutes" piece about Waco that was referred to in WACO: THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT. As soon as they saw that gunfire was directed into the building, and pyrotechnic explosions were visible on the FLIR, Infraspection told "60 Minutes" in a letter that they wanted out of the story.
I think a lady runs (ran) Infraspection, but the analyst was a guy. He was the one who first told me about Carlos, back in '96 or so. He was scared ****less, too. Called me up, I could hear his voice shaking, said "too many people have ended up in their graves already over this!" Said he had another analyst who'd be willing to look at the tape.
I thought him a trifle nervous at the time. Since he was the one who recommended Carlos, I suspect wherever he's living now, he's in his basement with a rifle pointed at the staircase. I can't say as I'd blame him too much, which is one reason I carefully avoid using his name here "
Washington Post 4/18/97 Richard Leiby Jim McGee " .."A year ago, around the time of the last Waco anniversary, the FBI was able to make this gunfire matter go away quietly. CBS News's "60 Minutes" was asking about those strange flashes on the FLIR tape. Its producers hired another expert who said he believed they were gunfire. Those are not gunshots, FBI officials insisted. They're reflections of sunlight on broken glass and blowing debris. And besides, there are no shooters visible on the tape, the FBI pointed out. You can't have gunshots without shooters. "60 Minutes" never ran a story. "I reached the conclusion that this was inconclusive," says Rome Hartman, a "60 Minutes" producer. The "Waco" documentary makers point to this as proof of a continuing cover-up. FBI spokesmen point to the same fact as confirming that the gunshot theory is nonsense. .."
Freeper aristeides 4/29/00 " So maybe something untoward did happen on April 19 of this year. If so, somebody has a ghoulish sense of humor. Speaking of things that happened on April 19th, I couldn't help but be struck by this: He said that the big problem the Committee seemed to see was the question of how they could get the information out, while at the same time preventing another Oklahoma City type reprisal--it was that shocking. The OK City bombing occurred a few weeks before the Burton subcommittee hearings on Waco in 1995. Could being able to make this argument have been one of the reasons why the FBI and other government agencies allowed the bombing to happen? . By the way, I can't understand why preventing another OK City bombing would be more important than cleaning up federal law enforcement and discrediting the guilty parties. Let ten such bombings happen. If the government can be cleaned up in the process, it would be a price well worth paying. I am a federal employee, and I am quite willing to subject myself to the risk of being the victim of such a bombing under these circumstances "
Freeper aristeides 4/30/00 " .. Remember that the final assault on Waco was 50 years to the day of the final assault on the Warsaw Ghetto, which was intended to be Hitler's Birthday present. And also, as a Washington Post story from later that week that Wallaby found tells us, Clinton paid a two-hour visit to the new Holocaust Museum "late" on that day of the final assault at Waco, Apr. 19, 1993 "
NewsMax.com 4/30/00 David Hardy " .David Hardy is an attorney who has been involved in civil litigation relating to the Waco raid of 1993. Mr. Hardy had significant deals with Carlos Ghigliotti, an expert Congress had hired to review infra-red film taken during the FBI raid of the Koresh compound. For the first time Mr. Hardy reveals what Mr. Ghigliotti told him about the film ..."
For the last year I have been privy to certain secrets which I was sworn not to reveal. For reasons I'll mention later, I am now released from my promise of secrecy.
The presence of FBI gunshots on the Waco FLIR [Forward-Looking InfraRed] videotapes has been news for the past few months, but the story had been setting on media shelves for years before that time.
The FLIR videotapes were made by an FBI aircraft orbiting the Davidian building, and show the scene as if it were a black and white video, in terms of heat and cold. The most important tapes were made on April 19, 1993, the day of the fire.
On that day, FBI swore again and again, it did not fire a single shot, and tried its best to keep Davidians from burning in the blaze.
My involvement in the Waco matter began in 1995, when a friend of my contacted me about the case. Apparently "60 Minutes" had taken an interest in the aerial infra-red footage and has sent it to be analyzed by a private firm called Infraspection. While experts at Infraspection determined the blips of light on the footage was gunfire, "60 Minutes" decided to not air the story at that time.
I contacted Infraspection and they offered me the names of other infrared specialists who might be willing to take on the work.
They highly recommended a Carlos Ghigliotti, who ran a lab in Laurel, Md.
I spoke with Carlos, but it was no-go.
He said that before he would put his name on an opinion, he would need a first-generation copy of the original FBI tape; he would stake his reputation on nothing less than the best material. At that point, the best we had were third-generation copies in VHS, so we had to let the matter go.
Three years later, in late 1999, I got a call from Carlos. He needed some other Waco videos which I had pried out of the FBI and ATF.
He related that he has been retained by the House Government Reform Committee, chaired by Congrssman Dan Burton, and was examining the FLIR tape under their authority.
Carlos added that he had obtained a remarkable copy of the FLIR, a quantum leap above what anyone else possessed. He had discovered that, even when FBI said it was passing out a first-generation copy, it was in fact giving out a copy, not of the original tape, but of a digitized "master copy."
Knowing that digitization compresses the image and discards detail, Carlos had demanded and gotten a copy of the original 1993 tape, made in Super VHS with some format specifications which ensured it had all the sharpness and quality of the original.
By good fortune, I was flying to his area on some work anyway, so I arranged to visit him in his lab.
It was impressive. He had a bank of Super VHS recorders feeding a row of large monitors, and tapped into a pair of the hottest computers I'd yet seen. With this, and some hardware he had personally designed, he could coordinate two, three, or four different videos and show them in parallel, frame by frame; thus an infrared image could be played alongside a simultaneous video made in visible light.
He was a pilot, and used the arrangement to track things such as illegal water pollution (the polluting water is generally warmer than the river or bay into which it flows, and thus shows up on infrared, while the coordinate visible image makes it easy to spot the location.).
Carlos had no politics that I ever noted, he was proud of his skill, and he was rigorously honest. He staked his reputation on every opinion, and made sure that it was unimpeachable.
In fact, he once mentioned, he'd been hired by FBI in the past, and cited them as a reference. He would let the chips fall where they might.
Sitting there in his lab, I was a bit cautious about asking his opinion of the Waco tape. I got a feeling, though, when he remarked, "The only thing that pisses me off over this, Dave, is when I hear government officials lying about things that I KNOW happened, because I've seen the evidence."
It was perhaps typical of him: a lack of honesty was more offensive to him than the prospect of official abuse or even homicide. Carlos lived by the truth, and could not condone any failure in that arena.
Carlos did offer me a few previews. He ran a portion of the FLIR video, which depicted events after an FBI tank had demolished the large room, commonly known as "the gym,' at the back of the Davidian's home.
By this point, the gym was a field of construction rubble loosely attached to the main building. In the midst of the image a strange flash occurred, perhaps ten feet long.
I asked what it was--clearly it was too long for a gun flash.
"That's a bullet in flight," Carlos said. I knew that a bullet after firing is far too hot to pick up, but I'd never realized they could be seen in infrared. I asked him if he was sure.
"I've imaged them when I've flown over shooting ranges. I know what I see there," was his reply.
Carlos rewound the tape.
"Now, let's see what he was shooting at." He pointed to a spot in the gym wreckage. The unmistakable image of a human being was there, jumping up from behind the cover of one pile of wreckage and sprinting to dive behind another.
The bullet flash came just after he dove down.
"Missed him by half a second," Carlos said.
I almost gasped. On my FLIR copies -- previously described a first generation, the best you could get -- the flash was visible but the man was not.
Carlos' copy, and equipment -- and his eye for detail -- had found the holy grail.
He had proof that FBI was lying.
FBI agents had dismounted from the tanks and engaged in a foot assault, invading the building.
"Yes," Carlos said, "they're lying."
He showed me another preview. This one was from ordinary color video, shot by telephoto media cameras from their position miles away. It was shot aftter the fire was already raging. The images were blurry and the angle shallow--bushes and tanks blocked part of the view of FBI agents moving around.
I'd seen the tape before, but Carlos' eye had seen what mine had not.
"Watch this guy here," he said, pointing to a specific human image on the other side of the parked tanks.
The agent moved, stopped.... and took a shooting stance. You couldn't see the weapon, but it was the stance of a man shouldering a rifle.
Then he turned his head toward the cameras, saw that he was on a line-of-sight with the media positions, and suddenly ducked down and lunged in front of one of the tanks.
That wasn't all. Carlos showed me another of the conventional video sequences.
From in front of one of the tanks, a long bright streak of fire came, looking like a large tracer bullet.
"That's not a sunlight flash. I've imaged the same flash from videos taken at two... no, three... different angles," Carlos said. "I think it's the fuse on a pyrotechnic grenade."
The "pyros" are teargas shells, well known for starting fires.
I noticed that the angle of the flash was decidedly downward. Carlos explained that the FBI was shooting down into the Davidian's underground storm shelter, sometimes called "the pit."
I said wait a second.... the pit was the exit of the underground tunnel leading out of the Davidian house.
The tunnel was where the FBI (incorrectly) thought the women and children had been placed.... so now FBI is gassing what it thought was their only escape route out of the fire. Carlos nodded affirmatively.
Before I left that day, Carlos gave me another tip.
There is a soundtrack on the last FLIR tape -- I should listen to it carefully. When I got back to my office, I did just that.
Before I was through, my jaw was sagging. FBI officials had admitted they stopped fire engines from responding to the fire, but only for a few minutes, until they thought it was safe for the engines to go in.
The soundtrack of the FLIR picks up their radio traffic that day. On the soundtrack, the commander at the scene is calling for fire engines, being told they are on the way, and hearing reports that none are arriving.
He finally gets so upset that he screams into the radio "IF YOU HAVE ANY FIRE ENGINES DOWN THERE, GET THEM UP HERE IMMEDIATELY."
He is told they will be there momentarily.... and none arrive.
Either he had been overruled by higher command, or the agents had gone insubordinate and were making sure the Davidians would burn. There was also a strange conversation about someone outside the building, and then pops that sounded like gunfire, and the FLIR aircraft pilot's asking another crewman "did you hear that?"
Carlos and I stayed in touch by telephone and email. I sent him useful data when I found it, and kept my mouth shut.
By the end, Carlos told me that he had spotted nearly 200 likely gunshots, many at full auto.
The FBI hadn't merely fired shots on April 19, it had hosed down the back of the building with rapid gunfire.
Carlos had carefully plotted the movements of each shooters. He could now show shots from one location, the shooter moving to another, and shots from his new site.
At least two individuals were shooting, close in to the building, with others lending support from a distance. And, all the while, FBI was going out with press statements claiming that the flashes could not be gunfire because no shooters were visible near them.
The FBI was digging itself deeper and deeper into the hole.
Carlos also told me that he'd seen FLIRs from nights before the gassing assault, and that it was apparent that the FLIR aircraft was being used to monitor the Davidians' water supply.
The water was stored in those big plastic tanks at the rear of the building, and the coolness of the water inside showed up as a darker area. It was apparent that the water supply was shrinking, and by 4/19 was almost gone. He had heard the aircraft crew talking about it, and noting that the level was going down.
So, essentially, they knew that thirst would force an end to the siege within a few days of 4/19. Which also meant that the FBI officials had lied to Reno when they said the Davidians had plenty of food and water and the siege was unlikely to end soon.
During this timeframe, Carlos' name first cropped up in the press, as an expert for the House Government Reform Committee who had opined that the FBI fired shots. Strangely, the Committee distanced itself from its own expert, stating in the same article that his opinion was based on regular video rather than FLIR -- which wasn't the case.
I asked Carlos if the Committee was abandoning him and covering matters up.
No, he replied, it was quite the opposite. He was briefing them on virtually a weekly basis.
They had uncovered a lot more information than he had. What he knew he couldn't talk about, except that one tiny part of it was that, not only the initial ATF raid, but the entire siege, had been funding out of money dedicated to the war on drugs.
One might say that the entire Waco affair was funded by official embezzlement, since all legal guidelines for use of those millions had been violated by ATF and FBI.
There were other things, he added. But these could simply not be let out.
They were sufficiently shocking to where the Committee was genuinely concerned that, if known, they might inspire violent retribution from radicals.
I said I'd heard statements like that -- the truth about Waco could not be explored, for fear of violence, but discarded them as agency excuses.
Carlos said no -- the fear is real, and it's not poppycock. The truth is really that grim. The Committee had not yet figured out how to reveal the truth without running this risk, and until it did, it had to disavow his work and sit on the other information.
Much of the data was in the hands of certain key reporters (a few of whom he named), and they were sitting on it for the same reason. But it would come out in time.
In March of this year, Carlos called with several more discoveries, that truly sealed the matter.
He'd managed to spot when a hatch opened on the tank at the back of the building, and when a crewman got out of it.
That crewman then fired at an image of a man who fled back into the burning building. Carlos had said that the House Government Reform Committee knew the name of the FBI agent under that hatch. When his testimony was taken, he denied everything -- but began shaking violently as he did so.
Carlos had another breakthrough. I'd spotted a strange flash on the tape, and for once had found one that he'd missed. While he was looking for that, however, he found some other flashes.
He told me that he could now link, by time and place, one of the conventional video images of an FBI agent taking a shooting stance, to the FLIR image of a gun flash at the same location and instant in time. The case was now open and shut.
Then, sometime in March of this year, his relationship with the Committee began to break up. I have only his side of the story on this. Apparently, the committee staff wanted quick results.
His response was that he had cataloged nearly 200 likely gunshots. To pin down each one to the certainty he required would take some more months. He wanted, not merely to say something looked like a gunshot, but that after examining every other possibility, after tying in the media videotapes and soundtracks, that there was no possibility it could be anything else.
He had reached that certaintly with some gunshots, but not with the rest. The staffers got into arguments with him -- they wanted results, now.
Some threatened not only to stop payment, but to sue him for what he'd already been paid. Chairman Burton himself called and tried to chew him out.
I urged him to stay on with them -- this was vital, and politicos were often hard to work with, you just had to put up with them. He called back a day later and said he'd thought it over and, no, he had better things to do than work with people who threatened him.
He was going to give a preliminary report, brief majority and minority staff, finish his report on the gunshots of which he was certain, and present that with a list of all the things he had not been able to analyze.
On March 18, he faxed me a copy of his preliminary report, identifying when the FBI agent (described simply as an "unknown subject") exited the tank hatch, and the gunfire of which he was certain, together with a brief outline of the movements of the FBI shooters. (As it turns out, this fax is apparently the only surviving copy of that preliminary report, other than those given to the Committee.). In late March, he briefed the staffs.
It goes without saying that by this point, Carlos had become a rather dangerous commodity.
He had found the most solid of evidence that implicated virtually the entire of the FBI Hostage Rescue Team, and FBI's high command, in clear perjury.
To the extent they were shooting and gassing in order to pin people in the fire, they were tied in on attempted murder, and accessory after the fact to attempted murder, as well.
Men were collecting government pensions who deserved to be in prison. The survival of HRT -- the reputation and perhaps survival of the FBI -- were on the line.
This was far worse than J. Edgar Hoover's COINTELPRO, far worse than Watergate, and after years of covering up, the entire agency hierarchy was now stuck to the tar baby.
Now Carlos was no longer under the Committee's control; he was free to talk to whomsoever he chose. Indeed, he had already briefed one of the Davidian's attorneys, and was mulling over whether to testify in the wrongful death suit they had brought.
I've said that I had sworn secrecy, and that I'm now released from that promise. This is a rather long article, but there is a reason. It's in part a memorial for a feisty and totally honest guy I came to like a good deal.
On April 19 of this year, from a hotel room in Waco, I called Carlos to report a minor discovery I had just made at the scene. I got his answering machine, but when it came time to leave a message, the tape just said "tape finished. Thank you for calling."
I thought he'd run out of tape--never happened before, but who knows?
I tried again from time to time -- same result. I sent email asking him to call. No reply. Well, maybe he was out of town. He did have other court cases going, and had been talking about taking a vacation,
Early on April 29 I tried again, and this time nothing picked up; the phone just rang off the hook.
That afternoon I received a call. Carlos had been found dead in his office. (The press reports said in his apartment, but the address was that of his office; it was on the third floor of an office building, and had no living quarters.)
Perhaps his time was up. He was only 42, and looked in excellent shape (I bet he worked out), but he did have a Type-A personality. Whatever it was, the man most dangerous to a very powerful agency, and scores of its agents, had been removed from the scene.
The next day the House Government Reform Committee was quickly distancing itself from its own expert, a man who had been briefing it for months, had submitted his preliminary report a few weeks before, and had been briefing its staffs within the past two weeks.
An AP story quoted Committee staff as saying that "Ghigliotti's work for the committee ended some time ago." Rumors were quietly placed that he was "controversial" and had been "fired by the Committee."
Let me set the record straight: I owe it to that honest man. In my phone log I have two calls from him, sometime between 3/18 and 3/23 (I often overlook writing in the new day). These are about 3-4 weeks before his death:
Notes on first call:
Kevin Binger, chief of staff to Burton, wanted report rewritten his way. Carlos needed stuff from locker (presumably Rangers' evidence locker or locker in custody of court) and committee refused to send him (Carlos) down there. [Again, the indication is that he's not fully broken off relations.].
Notes on second call:
Shots from side of tank. He had been showing the FLIR of a tank hatch opening and a guy coming out of the CEV to the Demo staff members; they agreed that the hatch opened but some didn't agree they could see the person. They knew by name the person under that hatch. Guy dismounts and shoots at a Davidian. Something about audio track at another point says tank is in pursuit of an unidentified subject. [Word unclear, begins with C, likely "Congress"] only wanted his anomaly list [i.e., his list of thermal anomalies, rather than a study of each]. Over a hundred of those. Something about four gunshots. He suggested Demos might pay for analysis of the rest. Demos unaware. [As I recall, he said the minority staff had been kept apprised only of the major developments, and were surprised to learn of all the details.]
I had placed high hopes on the Congressional inquiry, but my trust level is rapidly declining.
Carlos had said that the Committee would let it all out eventually, that they were just keeping a distance from him in the press reports until that time.
But now he's dead, and the Committee is claiming falsely that he was fired and had not worked for them for some time. But for his fax, and a phone log, the story might pass muster and his discoveries be buried with him.
I'm beginning to wonder if Carlos wasn't a bit too trusting of his employers. There are ways to silence Congressional oversight.
J. Edgar Hoover was a master of that ... it was amazing what a few files on the pecadillos of congressmen could do. And so far, for all the thousands of pages of documentation the Committee has gotten -- for the secrets they had uncovered, that Carlos takes to his grave, but considered so damning of the agencies that it might inspire another Oklahoma City -- not one word has been revealed to the public, and no hearings are scheduled.
Nobody ever said that politics is conducive to honor. But Carlos deserved better -- he was a genuinely honorable man.
Freeper roughrider 4/30/00 " .Camouflaged agents dismounting from the rear doors of tanks or infantry fighting vehicles are visible in several of the conventional videos of the last assault, including "Incident at Waco," one of the first, which was a starting point for "Rules of Engagement." Also, FBI overall leader, Jeffrey Jamar, told the media that HRT troops actually entered the tunnel and buried bus, allegedly looking for the children, and claiming the HRT troops found the air fresh down there. Unfortunately, Jamar's statements to the media, and I believe to Congress, are contradicted by other testimony:
1. HRT soldier and tank driver, Roger Craig, testified under oath at the Branch Davidian trial that he was ordered to cave in part of the building on top of the only interior entrance to the tunnel. Craig testified that he did this, and successfully blocked all access to the tunnel.
2. The FBI admits that at least two incendiary CS grenades were fired by launchers at the top of the tornado shelter that is at the end of the tunnel. That they may actually have fired more should be of no surprise, as one of the spent hulls was found at the opposite end of the building. Jamar's testimony suggests the FBI took a "hands off" strategy with the tunnel, but with these two incidents, and the HRT radio traffic that day, we know the tunnel was a target, and the FBI did not want anyone fleeing into the tunnel. If any got there, they were to be gassed "
Freeper Jeff Head 4/30/00 " ..So, here in the last 6-8 weeks we've had the Sheriff and both FLIR experts die ."
Freeper joanie-f 4/30/00 " He'd mentioned that the guy with Infraspection Institute, who had analyzed the FLIR for 60 Minutes back in '95 or '96, and found FBI gunshots and shooters on it, had been terrified. In fact, he'd sent copies of the tape to Carlos and to several others in the IR field, with notes saying "If anything happens to me, you'll know why." (The same guy later called me, said he didn't want his name used, that "there are too many people already in their graves over this." I wrote him off as him being rather nervous.) .. "
Freeper Abundy 4/30/00 " ..ME issue - unless things have changed, all autopsies (sp) are preformed by the medical examiner in Baltimore. If you have a stiff in Cumberland it goes to Baltimore for the autopsy. Strange, but true. .."
Neal Knox 5/1/00 " .Until less than a month before he died, Ghigliotti was the infrared (FLIR) expert examining the FBI's Waco tape for Chairman Dan Burton's House Government Reform Committee. Last October he told the Washington Post that "The gunfire from the ground is there, without a doubt." He had told private Waco researcher Dave Hardy much more -- and shown him a first-generation version of the FBI FLIR video shot the day of the final fire. That verson showed shots and a visible bullet trace, Hardy said, and the Branch Davidian who the shot had missed. Ghigliotti had also spotted someone taking a firing stance who had been filmed by a long-range commercial television video -- at the time and spot where the FBI FLIR tape showed a gun flash. .. Hardy, a meticulous researcher whom I've known over 25 years, had been provided a lot of information by Ghigliotti including the preliminary report he gave the Burton committee last month -- when he gave a final briefing to both the Republican and Democrat staffs. That was apparently the only summary of Ghigliotti's findings outside the committee. Dave wrote himself an insurance policy earlier tonight by posting a lengthy article on NewsMax.com based on information Ghigliotti had given him. I have reason to believe that Dave has also given a copy of Ghigliotti's preliminary report to certain members of the press. "
Neal Knox 5/1/00 " .By the way, immediately after the "reenactment" of the FLIR videotaping last month at Ft. Hood, Ghigliotti told Dave the test was worthless for the helicopter wasn't at the same altitude, the temperature was 20 degrees lower, and certain calibration tests had not been done. He was dead before the American-owned British aerospace firm that did the tests told Judge Walter Smith that the apparent gunflashes seen on the FBI FLIR were only reflections. "
Freeper pjd 5/1/00 " .This summary was posted on NewsMax today:
The following is a summary of conclusions reached by Carlos Ghigliotti, an infrared film expert. Mr. Ghigliotti completed this report as a consultant to the Congress. He determined federal officials had, in fact, fired into the Koresh compound.
Summary of the most important events that occurred on April 19, 1993
A complete analysis of the FLIR videotape (#3) taken between 10:41:57 and 12:16:13 was made using the equipment listed in volume 1.
An electronic grid was placed on the videotape and divided into 4 quadrants. The top left section is quadrant 1 or (Q1). The top right section is quadrant 2 or (Q2). The bottom left section is quadrant 3 or (Q3) and the bottom right section is quadrant 4 or (Q4). A videotape was recorded with this grid pattern and provided.
At 11:16:27 the tank or CEV (combat engineering vehicle) first appears.
At 11:18:40-Q1 the tank starts to demolish the rear wall of the gym. This continues on until 12:09:02-Q3 when the tank leaves the rear area of the gym. There were a total of 19 instances that the tank penetrated the gym.
At 11:23:02-Q3 & Q4 the tank has penetrated the gym for the 6th time.
At 11:23:23 the tank is completely inside the gym.
At 11:24:17-Q2 two unknown subjects appear from underneath the tank.
Between 11:24:30:16-Q2 and 11:24:36-Q1 the unknown subjects shoot into the hole made by the tank in the gym wall.
Between 11:24:50-Q4 and 11:25:04 there is a response in the form of gunfire from the inside of the gym directed at the 2 unknown subjects.
At 11:26:04-Q2 the tank breaks through the front wall of the gym.
Between 11:26:13-Q1 and 11:26:27-Q1 additional gunfire comes out of the gym directed at the 2 unknown subjects. This gunfire has pinned down the 2 unknown subjects on the ground.
At 11:26:26-Q1 the tank backs over the 2 unknown subjects. The approximate height of the tank is 20 inches and 6 feet in width between the tracks.
At 11:26:39-Q4 one of the 2 unknown subjects is clearly visible exiting out the hole in the front wall of the gym the tank previously made. The unknown subject turns to the right into the courtyard.
Between 11:28:04-Q1 and 11:28:14:04-Q4 there is gunfire emitting from the position the unknown subject was seen at 11:26:39-Q4 (the courtyard) the direction of this gunfire is into the structure.
Between 11:28:18-Q4 and 11:28:22-Q4 there is a response of gunfire coming out of the structure.
Between 11:30:09-Q4 and 11:30:15-Q4 there is gunfire from the same area in the courtyard directed into the structure.
At 11:33:51-Q4 there is gunfire between the gym wall and the swimming pool. The direction of this gunfire is into the structure (possibly unknown subject #2) since the infrared signature from this weapon is different from the rounds fired in the courtyard.
At 11:34:32-Q4 there is one gunshot directed at the unknown subject on 11:34:33-Q3 that is running and hiding between the gym and the swimming pool.
Between 11:34:33-Q3 and 11:34:34-Q3 unknown subject is being shot at.
Between 11:34:45-Q4 and 11:38:31-Q3 there is gunfire coming out of the structure.
Between 11:38:34-Q3 and 11:38:36-Q3 an unknown subject is seen hiding in front of the tank.
At 11:43:34-Q4 is the 3rd time the tank enters the front middle section of the structure. This is the side facing the cameras from the media. The tank enters the front part of the structure on numerous occasions and is fired upon every time it enters the structure.
Between 11:43:36-Q4 and 11:59:03-Q3 there is gunfire from the second floor front side directed at the tank.
At 12:03:59-Q2 unknown subject appears next to the tank in the rear of the structure.
At 12:05:17-Q2 1st time the tank inserts the boom into the corner of the front tower.
At 12:07:42-Q4 the fire is now visible in the infrared spectrum coming out from the window of the second story tower.
At 12:08:12-Q4 unknown subject comes out of the tank and shows up at 12:08:51-Q3 shooting at the other unknown subject that appears at 12:08:34-Q4.
Between 12:08:31-Q4 and 12:08:32-Q3 a cluster of thermal anomalies appear at the corner of the gym.
Between 12:08:34-Q4 and 12:08:44-Q4 unknown subject runs from the area where the thermal anomalies are. The subject hops over the rubble and hides in the gym.
Between 12:08:51-Q3 and 12:08:52-Q3 there is automatic gunfire into the area where the unknown subject at 12:08:44-Q4 was hiding.
12:09:02-Q3 rear tank leaves the area.
Between 12:10:41-Q3 and 12:11:15-Q1 numerous rounds of gunfire are shot from the center of the courtyard and all are directed into the structure.
No additional events of importance are viewable due to the fire overloading the detector on the FLIR.
CONCLUSIONS:
No additional gunfire is detectable on the videotape because the infrared detector on the FLIR overloaded with the infrared energy emitted by the fire. The gunfire did continue on. There is visible video evidence taken by the media to support this and there is gunfire recorded on the audio track of the aerial FLIR tape #4 taken by the same aircraft.
Total number of gunfire shots coming out of the structure 69
Total number of gunfire shots going into the structure* 57
Total number of flash devices 1 cluster
SUB TOTAL 127
Total number of times the tanks penetrated into the structure** 33
Total number of times the tanks penetrated thru the structure 1
TOTAL NUMBER OF EVENTS 161
· *THERE ARE 3 THERMAL FLASHES WHERE THE WEAPON USED, HAD A POSSIBLE FLASH SUPPRESSOR DEVICE INSTALLED, THEY OCCURRED AT 11:24:31:28, 11:24:35:10 AND 11:28:14:13. THEREFORE THE POSSIBILITY EXISTS THAT MORE THAN ONE ROUND OF AMMUNITION WAS FIRED DURING EACH OF THE 3 EVENTS. ALTHOUGH ONLY ONE ROUND OF AMMUNITION WAS USED AS THE AMOUNT FIRED FOR THIS LIST. · **AFTER REVIEWING THE VIDEOTAPE NUMEROUS TIMES. THE FOLLOWING PATTERN APPEARED, WITH ONLY A FEW EXCEPTIONS. THE BRANCH DAVIDIANS SHOT AT THE TANKS, ONLY AFTER THE TANKS PENETRATED THE STRUCTURE. TOTAL NUMBER OF TIMES, UNKNOWN SUBJECTS APPEAR ON THE FLIR VIDEOTAPE. 7
TOTAL NUMBER OF EVENTS THAT OCCURRED BETWEEN 10:41:57 AND 12:16:13 (FLIR TAPE #3) 198
Freeper GluteusMax 5/1/00 " .The author of Waco: Rules of Engagement and Waco: A New Revelation was on the radio (Robby Noel's show) this morning disclosing that the other 2 FLIR experts had near misses with death the same week that this man was killed. (Well, the police are treating it as a homicide anyway. Any bets on a 'natural cause' being determined for this 42 year old FLIR expert?) One man inexplicably developed a lethal level of blood poisoning and spent 10 days in the hospital, and the other one had a 'stroke' and is still hospitalized, although there is hope he will be well enough to testify in 2 months. "
Freeper d14truth 5/2/00 " ."A November 1, 1999 New Yorker article on Waco reports: "Allard, a former physics professor, ran a bit of the video for Danforth, stopped to explain the basics of thermal imagery, and then returned to the scene of what he believes is a pitched gun battle between Davidians and F.B.I. agents firing automatic weapons. "I can look at students, and I can tell you if they're paying attention," Allard says. "The Danforth people were totally absorbed." Of one scene in the video, he says, "There's no question that's a full gun battle." As he recalls it, "What I did with the Danforth people is, I said to them, 'Look, why don't you count the fire your-self? I played the tapes, frame by frame. And as you play them frame by frame the people say, 'I see one, two, three, four. . . I see five! No, I think there's four, run it back? And pretty soon they say, 'Yeah, there's five shots from there, and there's one shot from the other side." It is probably not good news for the F.B.I. that Danforth and his staff have been counting the F.B.I.'s putative automatic-gunfire shots at Waco... However, an independent specialist in thermal imaging, Carlos Ghigliotti, viewed the F.B.I.'s FUR tapes at F.B.I. headquarters, and concluded that shots had been fired. If the government is forced to confess another prevarication, the conspiracy fires will certainly flame higher." .."
Dallas Morning News 5/2/00 Lee Hancock " ..The lead lawyer in the Branch Davidians' wrongful death lawsuit asked a federal judge Monday to impound all information relating to the 1993 siege of the sect's compound from a Washington-area office where an infrared expert was found dead last week. Mike Caddell of Houston said he sought emergency intervention from the court in Waco to ensure that all significant information was preserved from the Laurel, Md., office and home of Carlos Ghigliotti. Police were still investigating the cause of Mr. Ghigliotti's death Monday . Judge Smith told both sides in the case that the British firm, Vector Data Research, would submit its final report on May 8 and would provide "conclusive evidence" linking each flash to a specific cause, such as sunlight reflecting off broken glass. . But Mr. Caddell and other lawyers representing surviving Branch Davidians and families of those who died have questioned Vector's conclusions, particularly the finding that no people were visible on the infrared video until well after the sect's compound began burning. "
Dallas Morning News 5/2/00 Lee Hancock " ..Mr. Caddell and another lawyer, David T. Hardy of Tucson, Ariz., said Mr. Ghigliotti had recently shown each of them repeated examples of what he said were images of people visible in the vicinity of some of the unexplained flashes that appeared on the film in the hour before the fire. Mr. Caddell wrote Mr. Danforth's office on April 17 and asked investigators to interview Mr. Ghigliotti, saying that the analyst had shown him one particularly compelling image on the video in which the hatch of an FBI armored vehicle "clearly opens, and it appears someone emerges from that tank." Mr. Caddell's letter stated that image appeared as the compound began burning and only seconds before a series of flashes appeared near the same armored vehicle. . "I have been trying to reach him for the last few days, but he is apparently out of town," the April 17 letter stated. "In any event, his work is by far the most impressive I have seen in terms of analyzing the April 19 . . . [videotape], and I do not think you can fully appreciate his work unless you visit his lab and spend several hours with him reviewing key points." Mr. Caddell also told the court last month that he planned to hire Mr. Ghigliotti to replace his principal infrared expert, who recently suffered a stroke. "
Dallas Morning News 5/2/00 Lee Hancock " .."Mr. Ghigliotti's work product on this issue is extremely important to plaintiffs and to the court's analysis and conclusions," Mr. Caddell's Monday motion stated. "Accordingly, plaintiffs seek an order from the court preserving the completeness and integrity of that work product. Without such an order, plaintiffs have no assurances that third parties will not lose, damage or destroy (innocently or intentionally) irreplaceable work product by Mr. Ghigliotti." "
WorldNetDaily 5/3/00 Sarah Foster " ..The mysterious death of a key figure in the ongoing Waco congressional investigation may not have been from natural causes, according to attorney David T. Hardy, who fears that his friend Carlos Ghigliotti, owner of Infrared Technology, may have been the victim of foul play. ...... "It's highly suspicious," says Hardy, commenting on the circumstances surrounding the death of the infrared expert, whose badly decomposed body was discovered Friday at 1:30 p.m., seated at his desk in his laboratory-office in Laurel, Md. Ghigliotti had not been seen nor heard from for several weeks ."
WorldNetDaily 5/3/00 Sarah Foster " ..As soon as he learned of the death, Hardy -- who since 1995 has been conducting his own investigations into the Waco issue -- wrote a tribute to his friend which he titled, "Memorial to an Honest Man," and posted it on his own
website that deals with Waco. ..In his tribute, Hardy discussed several of Ghigliotti's observations and discoveries that he had uncovered -- such as what he thought of the recent re-creation designed to test the thesis that the FLIR footage showed powerful evidence of gunshots being poured into the complex. ."Pure junk," is what Ghigliotti thought about the re-creation tape, according to Hardy. "The aircraft wasn't even at the right altitude, they didn't have the right procedures to verify that the sensor was functioning comparable to the one of 4/19, etc.," Hardy wrote. ."The best thing that could be done with any resulting tape (and this is BEFORE the results were known) was to drop it in the waste can. Whether it showed gunshots or did not, it'd be useless for proving anything, whether for the Davidians or the FBI." "WorldNetDaily 5/3/00 Sarah Foster " ..In an exclusive interview with WorldNetDaily, Hardy said he first talked to Ghigliotti in 1996, by phone, but not until December 1998, during a trip to Washington, D.C., did the two men meet face to face. Hardy said he was most impressed with the office and laboratory of Infrared Technologies, which were two adjoining rooms on the third floor of an office building. In the first room were desks and worktables. The laboratory was in the second, "with some really impressive equipment -- sophisticated computers, four large monitors, Super VHS decks," Hardy recalled. . If the death was not of natural causes, what would be the motive? WorldNetDaily asked. . Hardy's answer: "I think he may have known too much. Carlos told me he had discovered things that were much, much worse than anything that had yet come out." "
WorldNetDaily 5/3/00 Sarah Foster " ..This past December, Hardy visited Infrared Technology a second time, and Ghigliotti showed him some of the work he was doing. .. "Carlos wouldn't tell me everything," Hardy said, "but he did give me a 'little tidbit' as he called it. He told me the whole operation [at Waco] from the start of the siege to the end was funded out of the drug forfeiture monies that are supposed to be used only in the war on drugs. "He said not only the ATF raid -- the whole siege, most of it the FBI funded out of the drug war monies. Now those are special funds. He told me he had a lot of documentation showing the flow of money - which explains the new uniforms and new equipment the agents had at the start of the raid. "I don't know why they [the committee] put him onto this issue," Hardy continued, "but apparently he was working on it." He said Ghigliotti -- who was standing by his desk as he talked -- placed his hand on a "thick pile of manuals and memoranda" to indicate the documentation he had assembled on this most recent assignment. He told Hardy, "All the standards for when you're allowed to use that money are laid down in writing, and they [the government agencies] violated all of the standards to get at the money. And the committee knows it." "So basically, Carlos really had them not only for attempted murder, perjury, and a few other things -- he also got them for embezzlement [of designated funds]," Hardy observed, adding he hoped the committee would continue to investigate that angle. Hardy told WorldNetDaily he did not know what happened to the various documents Ghigliotti had compiled for his investigation into the funding of the raid and siege. "The last I saw of them they were sitting on his desk in his office," he said. "
WorldNetDaily 5/3/00 Sarah Foster " . Hardy explained: "There were several media video tapes made through gigantic telephoto lenses, but from one, two or three miles away. Carlos could import video into his computers; he had actually invented a system himself for showing on one frame the regular video and the FLIR. And then if you can coordinate them by time, by seeing some event that shows up on both, you can play both images side-by-side. What he'd done was, he got to a point where watching them side-by-side you can see in regular video a side view of a man shouldering a weapon. And on the FLIR at the same position, a flash of a gunshot. . "When I heard that I just cried, OK. End of game. The game is over," said Hardy. "I told him, it's all over. What's the debate over whether these are gunshots, if you have a man shouldering a rifle at the same time a flash is seen?" Hardy said he does not know where the tape is now. .. Hardy also isn't certain he's seen the same tape, but he did see one it could have been when he visited Ghigliotti in December. In any case, the one he watched was highly incriminating, he said. ...... "He showed me a regular video image of an FBI guy shouldering a gun," said Hardy. "Now, I'm not sure it's the same image, but you could see this guy, he was shooting at shallow angle to the ground, so you see bushes and then some parked tanks. This is after the fire has begun. And you see FBI guys on the far side of the tanks. It's a blurry image, and I had seen it before and never made anything out of it. I mean it just looked like lousy video. .. "Carlos asked if I had seen this before, and I said, 'Yeah.' And he said, 'I'll show you something I bet you didn't.' Carlos had a hell of an eye. He points to one of the men and says, 'Watch that man and tell me what he's doing.' And by focusing on one man I could see he takes a shooting stance, a stance of a man shouldering a rifle. You can't really see the rifle, but there's no question about the stance. Then he turns and realizes the media cameras can see him. You can't see the face, but you can see the dark helmet suddenly turn to all flesh color and you can see his shoulders turn toward you. "Then there's about half a second where obviously what goes through his mind is, Oh, no! He ducks down behind the tank. The reaction is unmistakable. Oh, no! Duck. And he squats down in front of the tank. That may be the image he was talking about that he could link by time." ."
WorldNetDaily 5/3/00 Sarah Foster " ..Hardy said he was in contact with Ghigliotti until March 18, and added that Ghigliotti considered his work with the House Government Reform Committee completed and had sent a preliminary report summarizing his findings. Ghigliotti faxed Hardy the summary, and Hardy in turn provided it to WorldNetDaily. (Read the report
page 1, page 2, page 3) .. The summary gives a breakdown of the final hour of the siege, from 11:16 a.m. to 12:11 p.m., complete with the number of gunshots fired by both sides. According to Ghigliotti, the Davidians did return fire, but only when the tanks penetrated the complex, which happened 34 times. .."I had promised to keep everything Carlos told me confidential," said Hardy. "But I feel I'm released from that promise." "APBnews.com 5/2/00 Amy Worden " Attorneys representing surviving Branch Davidians in their wrongful death lawsuit against the U.S. government have asked a federal judge to impound all materials related to the Waco siege from the office and home of an expert witness found dead here last week. Police found the decomposing body of Carlos Ghigliotti, a 42-year-old infrared-technology expert, in his Washington-area office Friday. The building's managers had asked police to investigate after not seeing him for several weeks. .. Police said there was no evidence of a break-in, struggle or any other foul play. "We are investigating it as an unintended death, that is, a deceased person with no immediately apparent cause of death," said Lt. Fred Carmen of the Laurel Police Department. ..Officials with the medical examiner's office in Baltimore said the autopsy was not yet complete. Carmen said the results could be in as early as next week. .."
APBnews.com 5/2/00 Amy Worden " Ghigliotti was hired last year as an independent expert by the House Government Reform Committee to analyze controversial videotapes of the 1993 raid showing unidentified flashes inside the Branch Davidian compound. Ghigliotti's conclusion that the flashes were bursts from government agents' weapons supported the plaintiffs' contention that the Branch Davidians were fired upon during the raid. . Hardy said Branch Davidian attorney Michael Cardell was planning to hire Ghigliotti as his new infrared technology expert after the first one suffered a stroke in March. Hardy said Ghigliotti's death hurts the plaintiffs' case. "His death is quite damaging," Hardy said. "He had not, as far as I know, submitted a final report, only his preliminary report that does not give all the details. Now new experts are going to have to reconstruct his work based on his outline and what's in his office. So much of that work was his eye, without him telling you what was there." .."
The Libertarian Enterprise Weekly 4/29/00 John Taylor, Editor " .Let me say this as preface: I have corresponded with David Hardy, and believe him to be honorable and honest. The material below is so shocking and explosive in nature that the first inclination is to sit on it and wait, to see if it is as it appears. ...... But freedom and liberty are too important for us to continue to be always prudent. So, against better editorial judgment (trust, but verify), I am forwarding this information just as received, edited only for formatting purposes. Please read it carefully, and realize that, as powerful as it may be, it is so if and only if true. ...... Please read this material closely. Please do not act irrationally. Please remember that we are unlike our enemies only as long as we remain on the moral high ground ."
Please read this.
Don't skim through it or skip to the end.
This is the most important e-mail you've ever received. Period.
Something has happened.
David T. Hardy, one of the lead investigating attorneys in the Waco case, sent this last night. I waited until I received his okay for me to send it out far and wide today, April 29, 2000. In Dave's words (which will again appear at the end of his original, unedited post below), "As far as you want, and feel free to name me as the source. I figure this needs to be real public."
Dave Hardy is a man of honor and is enormously well-respected throughout the US legal community. He presented the brief that led to the Brady Law being overturned before the United States Supreme Court. I would trust him with my life. I think I just have.
The information contained herein is vitally important, but it also serves as a particularly terrifying double-edged sword. I am uncomfortable about this hitting the Net. There are, as many of you well know, a whole lot of nut cases out there who will be "set off" when they read this, but I'm confident that the more people who know this information -- from the source and not second hand -- the better. Although I will contact certain "friendlies" (like an insider at FOX News) and local media types who know Dave and me personally, I wouldn't suggest that you just "drop this off at the news desk" somewhere and expect anything positive to happen. There's not many editors or news directors who would ever want this to go out.
Remember...
Freedom is a scary thing to many people. The alternative scares me far worse.
Everything which follows my e-signature is exactly as I received it; as Dave's typed it. I have only dropped his e-mail address from the header to avoid having him suffer through the tens of thousands of incoming e-mails that will flood in as a result of this post. I also respectfully ask that you not flood my mailbox in a similar fashion.
Please, for those of you now reading this with six or seven "forwarding arrows" attached to its contents, take on the responsibility of cleaning up the post before sending it on. Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Phil Murphy
****************************
Brassroots, Inc.
..
Envelope-to: [address deleted]
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 18:27:47 -0700
From: (David Hardy)
Subject: Memorial to an honest man
What follows is something I have not been able to reveal prior to this point. As I mention at the end, I am now released from my promise of secrecy ..
>To put it mildly: Holy shit.
>
>Dave, may I pass this out -- completely unedited -- far and wide?
>
>I'm speechless.
As far as you want, and feel free to name me as the source. I figure this needs to be real public.
Police reports indicate he was 42 yrs old. Autopsy is being done in Baltimore. He is said to have been found dead in his apt., but the address given is that of his office, on 3d floor of an office bldg (I've been there).
I'd previously spoken to Dr Edward Allard, who almost died of a heart attack the week before the FLIR test, the same week that another witness for the plaintiffs suddenly died of a heart attack. When I called Allard yesterday, I was told that he can no longer talk about Waco. Since Allard's disabling stroke, the attorney's for the plaintiffs have been looking for another FLIR expert and were going to sign on Carlos Ghigliotti, but unfortunately he was just found dead yesterday. Looks like there getting knocked off, one by one.
The following is a message from Attorney David Hardy, who knew Carlos Ghigliotti. In it he reveals not only critical insight into Ghigliotti's work and what he knew, but also new details about the gunfight around the back of Mount Carmel that Ghigliotti's work, with the best FLIR-video copy and equipment, had uncovered:
Attorney David T. Hardy writes:
[...]
Subj: Further info on FLIR
In August, 1999, Dan Gifford asked me to send an affidavit regarding a conversation I'd had back in 1997. I found it on my word processor, and it is set out below.
Background: after the gunshots on the FLIR were revealed by Gordon Novel (a really wild character, BTW), and confirmed by Dr. Allard, Gordon took the tape to Sixty Minutes. [As I recall, he then had a grudge against Mike McNulty, and figured to break the story on his own.]. Sixty Minutes sent the tape out for a second opinion, to a firm called Infraspection, in Vermont, I seem to remember. Infraspection confirmed that they were gunshots, and that they could see people moving around as well. (Sixty Minutes killed the story nonetheless.)
Afterward, Infraspection refused to publicly confirm its findings. Apparently it got word that its letters making the findings, then refusing to confirm them because of potential negative consequences to the firm (I think those were its words), were going to be used in the original "Waco: The Rules of Engagement." For some reason -- I think they couldn't find phone no's for McNulty or Gifford -- they called me. The guy who called was so nervous you could hear it in his voice, and said something to the effect that "there are too many people in their grave already over this." (I believe he was referring to Wm. Colby, whom Gordon said had given him the FLIR gunshot info, and who had been found dead just before this conversation.)
Incidentally, Carlos mentioned to me in one of our last conversations that the fellow had been so frightened that he made a stack of copies of the FLIR and mailed them to a bunch of fellow analysts, including Carlos, with notes reading to the effect of "If anything happens to me, you'll know why." Carlos regarded this with detachment or even a bit of amusement.
Anyway, here's the affidavit:
David T. Hardy, being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. My name is David T. Hardy. I am an attorney practicing law in Tucson, Arizona.
2. In 1997, I was involved in a Freedom of Information Act suit relating to the incident at Waco. I was accordingly in touch with Dan Gifford, who was working on a documentary on the subject, and with several other persons including an investigator named Gordon Novel. I knew that the documentary included infrared ["FLIR"] footage, and that the footage had been analyzed by an Infraspection Institute, which had been retained by a television network.
3. In early 1997, I was called by a Craig Kelch, of Infraspection Institute. My independent recollection is that Mr. Kelch had been trying to contract Dan Gifford in connection with the documentary, said that he had not been able to contract him, and had in some manner gotten my name and number. I recall that his tone was very anxious, and that he was quite upset that his business was going to be mentioned in the documentary. I recall he said something to the effect that he did not want his company name used, and also he did not want to be involved, for some reason relating to personal fear.
3. I have located my phone log of the conversation. My notes indicate it took place between February 28 and March 3, 1999. My notes are as follows [indecipherable words are bracketed, as are completions of abbreviations]:
Kelch
Cindy Bathsky -- CBS 60 min. & Novel
Wanted no part of this -- no trust [them or this] --
Wash. Post -- my co[mpany] name -- 5th Estate
Need contact me + Gifford
If corporate name -- gonna have problem
No want to be involved in the [the or this] [ ]
Too many end in grave ........."
Washington Post 4/18/97 Richard Leiby Jim McGee " .."First, The Post mailed copies of the FLIR tape -- those portions obtained from court filings -- to people with infrared and weapons experience. After the FBI gave us a one-hour excerpt (but not the whole tape), we showed that to local defense contractors who specialize in interpreting FLIR. And we took the tape to the military's top scientists. In all, 12 examiners offered opinions. These days, infrared analysts are fairly easy to find. Once an expensive military technology, FLIR is now widely used in private industry and law enforcement -- especially in drug cases where infrared cameras are used to locate indoor marijuana growers' hot lamps and methamphetamine labs. Four of the analysts contacted by The Post, who have extensive military and weapons experience, were convinced that they saw bursts on the tape indicative of gunfire going into the compound. "The gunfire signatures are real," said Joseph Horn, an El Paso, Tex., consultant on firearms evidence, who wrote a letter pointing out five incidents that Allard had also deemed gunfire. But where were the shooters? "It bothered me that I wasn't able to see their bodies," said Horn, a former Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy. "But the patterns of the firing were there." ."
Washington Post 4/18/97 Richard Leiby Jim McGee " .."Ron Smith, who runs a business in Tempe, Ariz., supplying machine guns to law-enforcement and military agencies, said he counted seven separate instances of automatic weapons fire on the tape -- also directed at the buildings. He believes the alleged shooters could have been wearing FLIR-resistant camouflage. .. Tom Simpson is a computer imaging specialist in Camarillo, Calif., who once trained military officials on how to read FLIR. Here's his report on the Waco tape: "We observed no less than 60 of what can only be explained as gunfire energy bursts . . . all directed at the compound. We took great pains to explain these events in another fashion . . . but were unable to find that explanation."
Houston Chroncile 5/6/00 Michelle Malkin " .Elian Gonzalez groupies continue to call the Easter-weekend raid in Miami "another Waco." These people need a Texas-sized kick in the rear. There is only one Waco. It's a travesty to compare the government's bloodless, three-minute retrieval of one little Cuban boy to the 51-day federal siege, capped by a fatal inferno, which claimed the lives of 21 innocent children and 59 adults on their native soil . One man who might have shed light on the lingering question of gunfire at Waco was Carlos Ghigliotti. Ghigliotti ran a Maryland-based firm called Infrared Technologies Corp., which had done extensive work for the FBI. Ghigliotti was, by all accounts, a respected expert in forward-looking infrared (FLIR) imaging and analysis. ...... "
Houston Chroncile 5/6/00 Michelle Malkin " .Last fall, after studying hundreds of hours of ground-view and overhead FLIR tapes of the Waco raid for the House Government Reform Committee, Ghigliotti concluded that the FBI had fired shots in the direction of the Branch Davidian compound during the final assault on April 19, 1993. The findings echo those of another prominent thermal-imaging expert: Edward Allard, a former Defense Department physicist, who designed the FLIR equipment used by the FBI, and analyzed Waco footage for the groundbreaking documentary Waco: The Rules of Engagement .. The FBI continues to deny categorically that any agent fired any shots that day. But now, Carlos Ghigliotti cannot tell the public about his follow-up research refuting the government's claims. Carlos Ghigliotti is dead...."
Houston Chroncile 5/6/00 Michelle Malkin " .. Police statements about Ghigliotti's death have evolved rather strangely. Initially, Officer Jim Collins told the news media: "We're investigating it as a homicide." A few days later, despite not having seen final toxicology and autopsy reports, Collins stressed to me that "there is nothing to indicate foul play was involved." Another spokesman, Lt. Fred Carmen of the Laurel Police Department, said: "We are investigating it as an unintended death, that is, a deceased person with no immediately apparent cause of death." .. Close followers of the Waco case are understandably suspicious. And why shouldn't they be? Law-enforcement officials have repeatedly lied, stonewalled and suppressed critical information on all aspects of the Waco case over the past seven years: They lodged bogus charges of child abuse against Branch Davidians. They denied using incendiary devices during the raid -- only to acknowledge having fired at least two flammable tear-gas canisters into the compound. They "misplaced" audio recordings from infrared footage that demonstrated official government orders to use pyrotechnics. They confiscated -- then "lost" -- vital autopsy evidence from the Tarrant County, Texas, coroner's office. ......And now, they want us to believe that what Ghigliotti and Allard separately concluded were gunshots were merely flashes of sunlight and reflections of broken window glass. "
CARLOS GHIGLIOTTI
MOUNTAIN MEDIA 5/7/00 Vin Suprynowicz " . The lead lawyer in the Branch Davidians' wrongful death lawsuit against the federal government Monday asked a federal judge to impound all information relating to the 1993 Mount Carmel siege from a Washington-area office where a government infrared expert was found dead last week, reports Lee Hancock in The Dallas Morning News Attorney Mike Caddell of Houston said he sought emergency intervention from the court to ensure all significant information was preserved from the Laurel, Md., office and home of Carlos Ghigliotti .."
MOUNTAIN MEDIA 5/7/00 Vin Suprynowicz " . Attorney Caddell had written to the office of former Sen. John Danforth, now conducting an independent investigation into the Waco holocaust, on April 17, asking investigators to interview Mr. Ghigliotti, saying the analyst had shown him one particularly compelling image on the video in which the hatch of an FBI armored vehicle "clearly opens, and it appears someone emerges from that tank." Mr. Caddell's letter states that image appeared as the compound began burning and only seconds before a series of flashes appeared near the same armored vehicle .. "I have been trying to reach him for the last few days, but he is apparently out of town," the April 17 letter to Danforth stated. "In any event, his work is by far the most impressive I have seen in terms of analyzing the April 19 (1993 videotape), and I do not think you can fully appreciate his work unless you visit his lab and spend several hours with him reviewing key points." ."
MOUNTAIN MEDIA 5/7/00 Vin Suprynowicz " . Attorney Caddell had also told the court last month that he planned to hire Mr. Ghigliotti to replace his principal infrared expert, Dr. Edward Allard, who suffered a stroke in March. "Mr. Ghigliotti's work product on this issue is extremely important to plaintiffs and to the court's analysis and conclusions," Caddell's Monday motion stated "
MOUNTAIN MEDIA 5/7/00 Vin Suprynowicz " . But Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the congressional committee chaired by Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., told police shortly after Ghigliotti's body was found that the analyst's work for the committee ended "some time ago." That sounded odd, so I decided to check with Tucson attorney David T. Hardy, who retired recently after a decade as headquarters agency attorney for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Washington, D.C.-a fellow whose credentials include letters of commendation for his "exceptional litigation support" from such anti-government extremists as the assistant attorney general of the United States (home page, indirect.com/www/dhardy/waco.html.) . Attorney Hardy now posts a long description of Ghigliotti's work at his own and numerous other web sites (including http://www.webleyweb.com/tle/index.html.) Among other things, he describes how "Through the committee, Carlos was able to obtain a remarkable copy of the FLIR, a quantum leap above what anyone else possessed."
On that high-quality tape, Ghigliotti catalogued "nearly 200 suspected gunshots, and had done the work necessary to verify that many of these were genuine. Understand that his idea of 'verify' wasn't just to see the image. He wanted to find the shooters, as well, and to plot their movement from one flash location to another. And he wanted to correlate the FLIR images to every possible ordinary video image, to see if he could link up what the media filmed from the side with what the FLIR registered from overhead. He was really hot on getting some footage shot by DPS from a site behind the building, so that he could tie that in as well. This man was thorough-no rushing to judgment. ... "He knew this was no normal case. As he once said, the Waco FLIR was probably going to be the next Zapruder film, and he wasn't going to say something that he couldn't prove against any criticism .."
MOUNTAIN MEDIA 5/7/00 Vin Suprynowicz " . "He said that the big problem the Committee seemed to see was the question of how they could get the information out, while at the same time preventing another Oklahoma City type reprisal-it was that shocking. ...I asked Hardy what he thought of the manner of Ghigliotti's death."It's very suspicious, though there's no evidence yet. The guy was only 42, he was in good health when I saw him, reasonably fit. A heart attack in a 42-year-old? It's not impossible, but it's sort of rare "There are three computer analysts on the side against the government in this case. The first one, Dr. Ed Allard, collapsed of a stroke in mid-March just before the re-creation test, so he couldn't attend. The second one, who was to be his replacement, a Dr. Siegel, collapsed in late March, unconscious; they diagnosed it as massive blood poisoning. After 10 days in the hospital he gets out. Now Carlos is found dead .."
MOUNTAIN MEDIA 5/7/00 Vin Suprynowicz " . I asked Dave Hardy if it was in anyone's power to make Carlos Ghigliotti's work disappear. "He delivered at least a preliminary report to the committee; he was working on the final report as late as early April. He was still working on the final report, so that, if no one has gotten to it, it should be sitting there in the office or on his word processor . "Mike McNulty told me he had taken Carlos' notes to Dr. Allard, who is apparently in good enough shape to go back and do some FLIR analysis now, and they had found some of the stuff notated by Carlos, including the guy running and shooting through the gym wreckage. So his final report, we may be able to find some truth out of that. ..."
MOUNTAIN MEDIA 5/7/00 Vin Suprynowicz " . "My last conversation with Carlos, he was trying to get that piece of footage of the helicopter (seen in McNulty's new video "Waco: A New Revelation," firing at a Branch Davidian on the roof of the church just before the fire) which is in the hands of the Texas Department of Public Safety, so he could compare it with the FLIR. He said the committee wouldn't send him to Texas to get it; they wouldn't pay for the plane ticket. So you've got the man who's going to hand you everything on a platter, and they won't spring for the plane ticket . "What really hacks me off is the committee saying 'He hadn't worked with us for some time.' According to my notes he only had a dispute with them" (the committee declined to give Ghigliotti more time to do a more detailed analysis, and he also complained they were slow in paying him) "in mid-March, after he'd been working with them for seven and a half months. I know he was still briefing them on work he'd already done, as late as March 30." "
MOUNTAIN MEDIA 5/7/00 Vin Suprynowicz " . I asked Hardy, the former U.S. government attorney, if he believed Rep. Dan Burton's committee is really trying to get out the truth about the Waco paramilitary action and subsequent massacre. "Up until the events with Carlos I would have said they were trying to bring the facts out, but now I doubt it. You've seen the evidence with your own eyes, he's given you the reports, and now they're claiming, 'Well, he hasn't worked for us for some time'? I start to doubt it." ."
Neal Knox 5/3/00 " The Branch Davidians' lead attorney, Mike Caddell, on Monday asked Waco Judge Walter Smith to impound all computers and Waco-related information in the office and laboratory of infrared (FLIR) expert Carlos Ghigliotti, whose badly decomposed body was found Friday. Yesterday, Special Counsel John Danforth joined that request. Ghigliotti had worked for Rep. Burton's Government Reform Committee until late March, shortly before he died. He had found that the FBI and Davidians had engaged in a gun battle, and that the shots and shooters from both sides were visible on the FLIR tape FBI took just before the fatal fire . In late April Caddell had told the judge he intended to use Ghigliotti as his FLIR expert in next month's trial, replacing Dr. Edward Allard, who recently had a stroke. .. On April 17 Caddell asked Special Counsel John Danforth to interview Ghigliotti and spend time in his laboratory reviewing his findings. He stated that he had been trying to reach Ghigliotti but hadn't been able to locate him. He was already dead ."
WorldNetDaily 5/13/00 Sarah Foster " .. In a brief statement released Thursday, the Laurel Police Department said that according to the autopsy report, the unattended death was of natural causes: specifically, a heart attack brought on by arteriosclerosis, or hardening of the arteries. The press release also stated that the department's investigative services division had terminated further investigation in the matter. ..The decision was not unexpected. ."
WorldNetDaily 5/13/00 Sarah Foster " .. "I'm not going to quarrel with the ME's [medical examiner's] report," attorney Michael Caddell, of Houston, Texas, told WorldNetDaily .. He had planned to bring Ghigliotti into the case as an expert witness. "The death of Carlos is a tremendous loss for our case," Caddell said. "There's no one who had done as much work of the same quality in this area as Carlos." When news of Ghigliotti's death was made public, suspicions as to its cause were raised by those involved in ongoing investigations and litigation. The official findings by the Baltimore Medical Examiner's Office have not assuaged these concerns -- not when three other experts in the same field of work as Ghigliotti and who share his conviction that the flashes on the FLIR tapes show gunshots have recently had close calls with death. ."
WorldNetDaily 5/13/00 Sarah Foster " .. There is Edward Allard, who appears in the documentary, "Waco: The Rules of Engagement," produced by Michael McNulty. On March 15 he suffered a stroke, from which he has still not fully recovered. "
WorldNetDaily 5/13/00 Sarah Foster " .. Then there is FLIR expert Fred Zegel, a long-time associate of Allard at the Pentagon, who at first disputed his colleague's contention that the flashes were gunfire. But, as he studied the footage, he changed his mind and has agreed to be a witness for the plaintiffs. In April, he reportedly went to a public auction where he collapsed and was rushed to a hospital where he was diagnosed as having blood poisoning. He was in a serious condition for 10 days. .."
WorldNetDaily 5/13/00 Sarah Foster " .. Lastly, there's Maurice "Mac" Cox, who according to his website on Waco, is a "recently retired mathematician/imagery analyst with 33 years experience in the technical intelligence field." Cox served as a consultant for McNulty's documentary. McNulty told WorldNetDaily Cox had recently had a serious renal [kidney] infection. However, he noted, Cox has had a "renal condition" for a number of years. "
WorldNetDaily 5/13/00 Sarah Foster " ..In [McNulty] his words, "I'm thinking about his death and the sequence of circumstances surrounding the illnesses of Fred Zegel, Allard and Mac Cox -- that's a lot of coincidences in a very short period of time -- involving four men who basically were all involved in one narrow issue in one very sensitive lawsuit. That's four of our FLIR experts -- but I've not heard of any of the government experts having problems like this. That's why it's weird. It's just too many coincidences." "
WorldNetDaily 5/13/00 Sarah Foster " .. Hardy told WorldNetDaily that upon learning of the autopsy results, he questioned an anesthesiologist who, in turn, backed the findings of the medical examiner. "He told me, 'Hey, it can happen,'" Hardy recalled. "Sure Carlos was young but my friend said death from a heart attack like that is not unknown. Apparently, if you've got bad genes and bad luck, you can be gone before you know it." .Hardy added that although the anesthesiologist wasn't concerned or surprised about Ghigliotti's death, he was deeply "mystified" upon learning of the sudden illness of Fred Zegel. ...... "He said if you are healthy enough to go to a public auction, how do you suddenly become unconscious from it in the space of an hour. Allard? No problem. He was an older man who had a stroke. Carlos'? Bad luck. Maybe. But I would still like a second opinion," said Hardy. ."
Waco 93 message board 5/12/00 Freeper Ada Coddington " . The police department attended Mr. Ghigliotti's autopsy in late April and was aware early on that his death was likely due to massive arterial blockage and resulting heart attack, according to the lieutenant I spoke w/ this afternoon (Wednesday 5/11). He said the damage to the heart and arterial blockage was evident. But he added that both local police and Maryland Medical Examiner's office chose to delay release of any detailed information until toxicology screens were completed - all due to the level of attention of the case, the lieutenant indicated (And forgive me for not listing his name. I have my notes, including his name, at my office. If it becomes an issue, will gladly provide). ..
..Those toxicology screens turned up evidence of only one chemical susbstance - an over-the-counter flu medication called Thera-Flu, the Lt. said. There was nothing else detected in Mr. Ghigliotti's bloodstream, and the levels of Thera-Flu were consistent w/ recently ingested, normal dose, the Lt. said. Police found an empty packet of Thera-Flu beside the air mattress that Mr. Ghigliotti used for a bed. Mr. Ghigliotti was found in that bed, wearing bedclothes, the Lt. said. The bed was in one of two rooms of his office - a room filled with elaborate equipment for video monitoring, editing and computer evaluation, the Lt. said. All of this machinery was turned off, and it appeared that Mr. Ghigliotti had laid down feeling ill. The Lt. added that a small portion of sandwich was found in his stomach - recently eaten, according to the autopsy exam. More of the sandwich was found on a plate beside the air mattress - some of it eaten by Mr. Ghigliotti's pet cats who lived with him in his office/apartment, the Lt. said. .
.Police did confirm that Mr. Ghigliotti did live in the office where he was found, the Lt. said.
The exact time of death will probably never be known, the Lt. said, but the ME's office has indicated that they believe Mr. Ghigliotti had been dead for about three weeks. A final written autopsy report, detailing the finding of arterial blockage & heart attack, will be delivered to Laurel PD w/i the next week or so. It must be reviewed by the Maryland state's attorney's office before public release, the Lt. said. "
Freeper adds "
. Can't wait to hear Maryland state's attorney's office spin on this. Gov. Glendening and Attorney General J. Joseph Curran, Jr. are Dem party footstools for Clinton. We can be sure that DOJ has the final review and edit on this. From AG j. Joseph Curran, Jr.'s web page;
"As Attorney General, I am the chief lawyer in the state.
My office represents the state in all matters in which the state is a party or has an interest."
That is to say the sword and shield of the Democratic Party, much like the KGB. He's the man behind Montanarelli's prosecution of Linda Tripp. ......"
Alex Jones Radio Show, Interview of Michael McNulty 5/4/00 "
An Interview of Michael McNulty, Producer of WACO, A New Revelation. Alex Jones Radio Show, May 3, 2000
MM: And at this particular point, I would say this: the timing of Mr. Ghigliotti's death, the timing of Ed Allard's stroke and one other issue: Fred Segal, who is Ed Allard's counterpart on the Branch Davidian team, a well-known FLIR expert, also had an incident. He went and attended the test at Ft. Hood on March the 19th. After departing, he went to upstate New York for an auction he was attending and collapsed - unconscious. He was taken to the hospital. He had a high fever and it seemed he was suffering from blood poisoning. They treated him for ten days with intravenous, high-dosage, high-powered antibiotics. And he did recover.
But those three incidents: Ghigliotti's death, Allard's stroke and Segal's bout with blood poisoning - - had it just been left unattended, it would have killed him, is very curious and very disturbing. So I am very anxious to find out what had happened to Mr. Ghigliotti and I'm hopeful that it was natural and that this was all just circumstances. But, you know, it really leaves me uncomfortable thinking that all these circumstances could happen to the same group of men who are central to the investigation of the FLIR, all in one particular time frame. It's just a lot of coincidences.
AJ: And they tested Segal for anthrax.
MM: No, if it had been anthrax, Mr. Segal would be dead by now.
AJ: Well, I don't know if you saw the Clinton Chronicles and some of those other films?
MM: He would also have symptoms, also.
AJ: Yea, exactly, just right off the bat, when you mentioned the Segal thing, I had been hearing about it, but I hadn't confirmed it, so I didn't talk about it. I heard that, but that protracted sickness, at a low dosage level, some of the folks around Clinton, exposing some of his drug dealing, came up with anthrax..
MM: Segal was definitely blood poisoning. He was not exhibiting any other symptoms. I saw him this weekend, he's fine.
AJ: Well, I understand. You're saying he probably would have died if he wouldn't have been put in the hospital. It's blood poisoning.
MM: Right.
AJ: Did they find out what type of blood poisoning?
MM: All they knew was that there appeared to be a site at which the bacteria entered on his leg. Hey, in Texas, with all the creepy, crawling critters, you can contract blood poisoning, the kind that leaves that wonderful red line that goes from the wound up towards your heart. The standard, everyday, it-will-kill-you-dead if you don't treat it blood poisoning.
AJ: Interesting. And he got sick right after he left Ft. Hood.
MM: Shortly after.
AJ: Oh. Oh, well it was just accidental.
MM: Well, I don't know anything more than you do. (laughs)
AJ: I hear you.
MM: Let's take some calls.....
LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT, MD Freeper OutSpot 5/11/00 "
***MUST CITE FREEREPUBLIC.COM*** I just got of the phone with the Laurel Police Department. They are in possession of a press release relating to the death of Carlos Ghigliotti.
.. Autopsy results from Carlos Ghigliotti as reported from the office of the Chief Medical Examiner for the State of Maryland.
Mr. Ghigliotti died of natural causes. Cause of death was a heart attack which resulted from arterial cirrhosis.
.. The investigation into the death of Carlos Ghigliotti is therefore being terminated by the Laurel Police Department.
..For copies of the press release call
LAUREL POLICE DEPARTMENT
tel. (301) 498-0092
The doctor who performed the Autopsy was
Dr. Pestaner
Assistant Medical Examiner at the
OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND
tel. (401) 333-3250
.."
The Associated Press 5/14/00 " ."We're not giving up, but I don't know how we'll replace Carlos Ghigliotti," Davidian attorney Mike Caddell told the Waco Tribune-Herald. "He had done more than anyone who has looked at this subject." ..The plaintiffs had already notified the Waco federal court that they planned to use Ghigliotti as an expert witness in the trial, set to begin June 19 in Waco. ..Ghigliotti was to replace Edward Allard, a physicist from the Army's Night Vision Laboratory who suffered a stroke this spring. It remains unknown whether Allard will play a role in the upcoming trial before U.S. District Judge Walter Smith Jr., who is presiding over the Davidian lawsuit in Waco. Caddell said he is working with Laurel police to gain access to Ghigliotti's workplace. He expects to be given permission to enter the facility next week. In addition, Caddell will take the depositions of British infrared experts, possibly in early June. The experts, who work for Vector Data Systems, were among those who conducted a March 19 field test at Fort Hood near Killeen. The company submitted its analysis of the test last week Smith. "
Washington Weekly 5/9/00 Rep Traficant " .Mr. Speaker, Carl Ghigliotti, the 42-year-old scientist who investigated the Waco massacre, whose body has been missing for 2 weeks, was found dead. Ghigliotti is the man who flat out said, 'The FBI is lying about Waco. The FBI did fire automatic weapons into the burning building.' .. Something is wrong here, Mr. Speaker. Records now show the FBI lodged an alleged or false child abuse charge against the Davidians. The FBI denied, then admitted, using tear gas. The FBI confiscated, then supposedly lost, vital autopsy evidence that would prove what happened in Waco. .. Beam me up. We have developed a stone cold police state in America, believe me, from Waco, Ruby Ridge, to Miami, Florida. Every American knows it, no one is doing anything about it. There must be a full investigation into the death of Carl Ghigliotti . I yield back the need to pass some oversight on this Justice Department and pass my bill, H.R. 4105 "
106th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 4105 " .. To establish the Fair Justice Agency as an independent agency for investigating and prosecuting alleged misconduct, criminal activity, corruption, or fraud by an officer or employee of the Department of Justice. ."
Associated Press 5/14/00 " A lawyer representing surviving Branch Davidians in a wrongful-death lawsuit against the government says the death of an infrared expert who contended that shots were fired by the government during the final moments of the Waco siege is a major setback in the case ... [Carlos]He told The Washington Post that he had determined that repeated flashes on the video came from government gunfire - and assessment mirroring the analysis of two retired Defense Department experts the sect's lawyers hired. .Ghigliotti was to replace Edward Allard, a physicist from the Army's Night Vision Laboratory who suffered a stroke this spring. It remains unknown whether Allard will play a role in the upcoming trial before U.S. District Judge Walter Smith Jr., who is presiding over the Davidian lawsuit in Waco Caddell said he is working with Laurel police to gain access to Ghigliotti's workplace. He expects to be given permission to enter the facility next week. In addition, Caddell will take the depositions of British infrared experts, possibly in early June. .."
Inconsistencies?
And Debate between Dave Hardy, Ol Dan Tucker and Ian Goddard
Crime Scene
Freeper Dave Hardy 5/4/00 " .Covenantor writes: First, heartfelt thanks for responding to the questions that have been raised on this forum, as well as the calm you've maintained on this sometimes rowdy thread/s. Re: the office....do you recall the number of adjacent offices or perhaps their tenants? I had planned to swing past this week just to get a sense of the place and surroundings. The un-noticed odor really puzzles me if the adjacent offices are occupied. How could one work there without complaining long and loud about it? . [Hardy replies] I didn't really look at the other offices. As I recall, they all had solid doors, no glass panes alongside the doors, that sort of thing. I have no idea why someone wouldn't have noticed the odor--I'd have expected it to get sucked into the cooling ductwork, if nothing else. "
Freeper Dave Hardy 5/4/00 " .Finally one hopes that Carlos had back-ups off-site in a safe place, a seemingly prudent precaution in light of your conversations. If the MD State Police are involved in the investigation, doj already has everything Carllos had in the office or home. [hardy reply] What? You mean the Maryland State Police are something less than totally reliable, apolitical creatures? It can't be! : ) .. I dunno how he backed up. It would have been quite a task. I forget exactly the specs he gave on his computers, but they were pretty impressive. He did video, and wasn't a fellow to think that a 5 gig hard drive was big! While I'm at it... One of the earlier posts seemed to say that I'd said Carlos described the words on the FLIR audiotrack, about the fire engines. He didn't. He told me to listen to it... and there the audio track is. It speaks for itself.. "
Davidians Fired First?
Freeper OlDan Tucker 5/2/00 " Do you remember when I said that the fall-back position for the feds' cover story about the gunfire recorded on the FLIR being a fire-fight between the feds and the Davidians? I believe this was the source --Carlos Ghigliotti. .New York Post 1999? Brian Blomquist - "... He said the tapes also show that the Branch Davidians were firing on the FBI agents during the siege, meaning the FBI could have returned fire based on the rules of engagement..."
Freeper Ol Dan Tucker 5/2/00 " Indeed, it appears that they could use Carlos Ghigliottis statements to argue the Feds were only returning fire had they any need to admit to the presence of gunfire on the FLIR test. With the Vector findings being what they are, Im very concerned! I understand there will be no jury now. Previously that would have not been alarming to me, but having added quite a bit to the "theory" Im now wondering if the long prison terms given to the Davidians by usurping some procedures at trial was not a matter of outrage at the time but rather a necessary step to gain control over the survivors in the interest of national security. Sadly, if that is the case the truth will once again be buried in a non-jury trial - though the families might receive substantial damages (sigh) ..Add my sigh to yours... "
Guy Ducking?
Freeper Dave Hardy 5/3/00 " .I would like to hear your analysis of the video showing the guy ducking! This would support the notion that they were very aware of the location of cameras and kept their greatest activity to the rear of the building. BTW, it appears they did the same in the Elian raid guns were used in the rear only. I find that part intriguing as well. Since Hardy wrote that he's seen it before, there might be a good chance that it's on either WTROE, WANR or possibly Waco II. I'll check tonight and let you know. [Hardy reply] I had seen some footage resembling that, but I dunno where. My knowledge of it is: (1) Carlos said it had been shot by some media cameraman; (2) he said it showed events near the storm shelter or pit; (3) it was *after* the fire broke out; and (4) it was obviously shot from a great distance using fairly powerful telephoto. In the foreground, you see bushes and trees, out of focus. Beyond them you see some tanks. Beyond those you see FBI agents moving about. I can't be more specific than that. To spot the agent won't be easy. If you can find a tape like that, keep rerunning it, focusing on each human figure, one at a time. I suspect any of us could look at it five times and never see the figure. It took Carlos there, putting his finger on the screen, and saying to watch this one blurry figure .."
Freeper Ol Dan Tucker 5/4/00 " . Thanks for the info. I have found two different clips that are a little like what you've described. They were both shot at about the same time frame and were shot from two slightly different camera angles. The one on the left was taken from Waco II: The Big Lie Continues. I've outlined the tank in bright green and the two feds in red. There is about 30 seconds or so of video in this clip and there is quite a bit of activity as the feds move from this position toward the direction of the front door. [photos] . The one on the right was taken from Waco: A New Revelation and is much shorter than the one in Waco II. The tank is fairly clear. The feds are outlined in red. There appears to be something on the ground between the two feds that is drawing their attention. It shows up in these pics as a white blob. This section is a part of the tape where Doyle talks about his exit from the building. There is a third clip in WANR where a fed exits out the back of a Bradley that's parked down by the underground shelter and appears to assume a shooting stance for a brief instant, then disappears back inside the Bradley, but this clip was shot around the time that the white smoke appeared from inside the shelter. Note that I've color-corrected this image from what was shown in WANR to clarify the details in the shadows. Click on the thumbnail to view the full-size image. .."
Freeper Dave Hardy 5/4/00 " .Also, Im extremely anxious to hear what you find tonight on the "guy ducking" and the "water inconsistencies." The research is invaluable in sorting out the accurate details and sources! ......... [Reply from Ol Dan Tucker: ] I checked and there's nothing on the tapes I've got that show the guy ducking and the FLIR footage doesn't show the correct angle of the water tanks to be able to make any sort of a determination about the level of water in them. Dan . [Reply]I sorta get tired reposting the same stuff, and it seems a statement is no sooner made than it is misconstrued. The guy ducking is NOT on the FLIR, but on a media-made ordinary videotape. Carlos' remark about the level of the water is not based on FLIR made the day of the fire, but on FLIR made on the nights preceding it "
Freeper Ol Dan Tucker 5/5/00 " [Original posting] Also, Im extreme